As you know, I am providing a book report of this ground-breaking book Health at Every Size. because of it's radical suggestion that we can trust our own bodies to reach a natural weight set point and never ever diet again. We can do this by 1. learning to feed physical hunger with nourishing food; 2. enjoying the food, 3. sensing when no longer hungry and 4. stop eating.
In this edition of the book report, I venture into one of the more controversial aspects of her book...examining what we eat and why we are eating it. According to the author, this is the crux of the matter; the food we commonly eat is simply not that nourishing. Hence the title of Chapter Four "We're eternally hungry"
The first three chapters were meant to provide enough evidence from the vast number of studies on weight loss to convince you that perpetual dieting won't work and actually makes it more difficult to keep weight off for the long term. In addition, exercising without a long term change in eating habits won't lead to permanent weight loss either. So, the question is, "If we can't diet then what should we be eating?" The author points out that the human body has evolved to thrive on a hunter-gatherer type of diet (greens, grains, fruit, nuts seeds and some meat). Hunter gatherers did not have high fructose corn syrup, stabilizers and emulsifiers that are common ingredients in processed food. In addition because the hunter/gatherers that gained weight and kept it on were rewarded by staying alive, while the ones who lost weight quickly died off, we are genetically presupposed to maintaining our weight around a well-regulated setpoint. In short, for longterm weight loss, WHAT you eat is more important than HOW MUCH you eat.
The problem with processed food is the mixed signals that it sends our bodies. In the hunter/gatherer diet, the food provided sufficient calories, nutrients and roughage (fiber) such that the body's weight control monitors located in the stomach, liver, pancreas and brain would turn off the appetite when sufficient levels were reached. With a processed diet, the body will have sufficient (often an overabundance of) calories but little nutrients and in some cases no roughage at all. So while some aspects of the weight control monitoring system say ENOUGH, others are saying MORE, MORE and we will eat more.
Chapter Four provides some history for the high-fat/high-sugar, overly processed and animal-product rich standard American diet but cautions the reader not to make broad generalizations like "all meat is bad" In fact she writes.
I'll say it now and I'll be saying it again: Please do not use this information to create or justify self-punishing rules for demonizing food or restricting your intake. if you find yourself doing that, stop reading this chapter....
The chapter goes on to describe the health issues associated with high-glycemic foods and the benefits of fiber (an apple is better than apple juice). Also presents studies detailing the benefits of whole grains vs refined. (brown rice is better than white rice). There's a section on high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) that states just how much of this sweetener Americans consume (estimated ins 2001 to be 62.6 pounds per person per year). The issue with HFCS is that although we eat a lot of it, the body's weight control monitors don't register it as nutritious, so we get the calories but not the signals that we've had enough. This is a common problem with artificial sweeteners also. In fact, one study with rats showed that artificial sweeteners could also induce our brains to crave more sweets.
The link between food and brain is also implicated in fat. In animal studies that included more repeated and frequent exposure to fatty food, brain mechanisms reconfigured to crave more fat. The type of fat used in these type of studies is saturated fat (found in animal products) or transfats (found in processed foods) and not unsaturated fats which is found in plants.
The health benefits of a diet rich in plant foods is in the section called "Protein..and the Meat Controversy." The author is not suggesting that we all become vegetarians. However, she is urging us to consider protein as an accompaniment rather than the main attraction on the plate. A plant rich diet reduces the risk of heart disease in addition to aiding in weight loss.While a little bit of meat protein will help you have the "full" feeling longer after eating.
In the final two segments, a theme begins to develop around how to create healthy eating and that is to PAY ATTENTION to what you put in your mouth. The segment about Drinks points out the strong correlation between soft-drink consumption and heavier weight. This is especially true with children and adolescents. The author suggests that we not only read labels to know how much HFCA or artificial sweeteners are contained in the beverage but that we also pay attention to how it makes us feel after we drink it: sluggish or energized; hungry or still thirsty.
The segment is followed by one on Processed and Fast Food, even though the entire chapter has really been about comparing the health and weight benefits of less processed food in the diet. That message is merely summed up in this segment where the author concludes that the type of food we eat has an effect on the weight monitoring signals between gut and brain. In essence, the food that we eat, sends us signals and communicates that we need to eat or that we need to stop eating. However we need to first hear the signals before deciding on how to answer it.
The chapter concludes with a few exercises in which the reader can learn about their eating habits: "How Do your Eating Habits Drive Your Setpoint?" "Check Your Diet for Fiber;" "Fat Consumption" and "Eating Activity Habits."
Before ending, I'd like to return to the idea of PAYING ATTENTION to what we eat. In Sacred and Fit, one goal is to not only pay attention to what we are eating but to also consider why we are eating it. In order to become a unrestrained eater (one who listens to her body's hunger signals) a person has to be paying attention and in order to pay attention the person can't be in an ever rushing, crazy frenzy. Even in this chapter, Dr. Bacon urges us to create a healthy relationship with food. and to do that we must rid ourselves of the idea that some food is good and some is bad. One has to admit that processed food tastes good. The goal is moderation. Dr. Bacon uses an example of a Twinkie..
If you maintain a neutral attitude
you can watch your response to (a) Twinkie. You can be more perceptive
to its flavor, noticing whether it really tastes good to you or if it
was just the idea that tasted good. Perhaps you learn that it doesn't
satisfy your craving-that there was something else you really wanted
that the Twinkie can't provide. Perhaps you become more sensitive to
your taste buds toning down after the first few bites, making the next
bite less pleasurable. Or perhaps you notice that half an hour after
indulging in that Twinkie your energy crashes and you start craving
sugar again. This information will ultimately affect your taste for
Twinkies in the future. (So) is eating that Twnkie good or bad? It all
depends on how frequently you eat it, how much you eat, what else you
eat it with, whether you were attentive to it....By staying connected to
your body,some foods may lose their appeal or you may no longer feel
driven to over-indulge.